Saturday, June 27, 2020

Website Credibility Essay - 550 Words

Website Credibility (Essay Sample) Content: Website CredibilityNameInstitutional AffiliationWebsite CredibilityNowadays, conducting research has eased because of advances in information and communication technology. It is becoming increasingly important for scholars to appraise the sources they use for credibility. Many students are confronted with an immense range of content when carrying out online research. Therefore, it is important for them to learn how to evaluate such sources for factual accuracy and relevance. Determining whether a websiteà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬s information is reliable or unreliable requires careful judgement. One approach to evaluate the quality of information is to apply a resource guide commonly known as the CRAAP test. According to Harrington, CRAAP follows five extensive criteria namely currency, relevance, authority, accuracy and purpose to concisely gauge the authority and value of online sources (Harrington, 2015).The CRAAP test benchmarks can be expounded as follows:Currency refers to ap propriateness or how up-to-date the information is. Some unreliable websites provide obsolete information with dysfunctional links therefore offering an unrealistic interpretation of a given topic.Relevance denotes the significance of the information to a given research topic. A relevant site should provide comprehensive answers to a question and add value to the existing body of knowledge.Authority basically points out to the qualifications and knowledgeability of the informant or source. Accuracy refers to the trustworthiness of the content based on supporting evidence ad grammatical accuracy.Purpose refers to the sourceà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬s reason for existence, objectivity of viewpoint and clarity.Application of the CRAAP test on two website links (on the autobiography of John Locke, a 17th century philosopher)./tas/locke/index.htmlThe link above leads to a piece on the memoir of John Locke. The website adheres to the five CRAAP test benchmarks as follows:The information presented is cur rent. The siteà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬s content has numerous up-to-date sources cited regarding the subject. It was initially printed in 2007 and brought up-to-date in 2014.All links provided function accurately.Relevance: The site gives pertinent information pertaining to subject matter. The author offers handy links relating to Lockeà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬s history, his work and related information.Authority: The site is written from a point of expertise as indicated by the authorà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬s credentials offered. John Attig is affiliated to Pennsylvania State University.Accuracy: the content is most likely accurate based on the number of updated references provided on the John Locke Resources Blog link.Purpose: The site does not seem to show bias.Overall, appears to be a credible source of information.http://lostpedia.wikia.com/wiki/John_LockeThe above link points to a site without a specified author. While it is titled philoso... Website Credibility Essay - 550 Words Website Credibility (Essay Sample) Content: Website CredibilityNameInstitutional AffiliationWebsite CredibilityNowadays, conducting research has eased because of advances in information and communication technology. It is becoming increasingly important for scholars to appraise the sources they use for credibility. Many students are confronted with an immense range of content when carrying out online research. Therefore, it is important for them to learn how to evaluate such sources for factual accuracy and relevance. Determining whether a websiteà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬s information is reliable or unreliable requires careful judgement. One approach to evaluate the quality of information is to apply a resource guide commonly known as the CRAAP test. According to Harrington, CRAAP follows five extensive criteria namely currency, relevance, authority, accuracy and purpose to concisely gauge the authority and value of online sources (Harrington, 2015).The CRAAP test benchmarks can be expounded as follows:Currency refers to ap propriateness or how up-to-date the information is. Some unreliable websites provide obsolete information with dysfunctional links therefore offering an unrealistic interpretation of a given topic.Relevance denotes the significance of the information to a given research topic. A relevant site should provide comprehensive answers to a question and add value to the existing body of knowledge.Authority basically points out to the qualifications and knowledgeability of the informant or source. Accuracy refers to the trustworthiness of the content based on supporting evidence ad grammatical accuracy.Purpose refers to the sourceà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬s reason for existence, objectivity of viewpoint and clarity.Application of the CRAAP test on two website links (on the autobiography of John Locke, a 17th century philosopher)./tas/locke/index.htmlThe link above leads to a piece on the memoir of John Locke. The website adheres to the five CRAAP test benchmarks as follows:The information presented is cur rent. The siteà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬s content has numerous up-to-date sources cited regarding the subject. It was initially printed in 2007 and brought up-to-date in 2014.All links provided function accurately.Relevance: The site gives pertinent information pertaining to subject matter. The author offers handy links relating to Lockeà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬s history, his work and related information.Authority: The site is written from a point of expertise as indicated by the authorà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬s credentials offered. John Attig is affiliated to Pennsylvania State University.Accuracy: the content is most likely accurate based on the number of updated references provided on the John Locke Resources Blog link.Purpose: The site does not seem to show bias.Overall, appears to be a credible source of information.http://lostpedia.wikia.com/wiki/John_LockeThe above link points to a site without a specified author. While it is titled philoso...

Sunday, June 7, 2020

Master Every Aspect of the Chicago/Turabian Format

February 5, 2019 Chicago Manual Style, or CMS, is one of the most frequently used styles for formatting academic papers in the United States. It is widely used in papers on social studies and history and is something most US students will encounter at least once in their life. General Format Rules The font should be clear and legible; Times New Roman is the most commonly used one/ Choose a 12pt font for your paper. All text, except for block quotes, should be double-spaced. Create 1-inch margins from all four sides of the text. There shouldn’t be any extra space between the paragraphs. At the top right of each page there should be a running header, where the last name of the author and the consequent page number are placed. The title page shouldn’t have the header, and the header of the next page should have the number 2. If you are using any quoted or paraphrased fragments, there should be a corresponding footnote on the page. Title Page The title page introduces your paper to the reader, which is why you should pay extra attention to it. Sometimes you will be given instructions on how to write the title page by your professor, but there are also some general rules to follow: The title should be located in the central part of the page. In case the title contains more than one line, it should be double-spaced. Place your full name underneath the title and center it. In the lower right part of the page, specify your course number, the name of your instructor, and the due date of the assignment. These three lines need to be double-spaced. In-Text Citations If you are choosing to use parenthetical citations in your paper, make sure to observe the following rules: Start with the last name of the author, the date of the publication, and the number of the page. Parenthetical citations should not contain any abbreviations. Don’t include any punctuation between the author’s name and the publication date. The publication year and the page number should be separated with a comma. Parenthetical citations always come after direct quotes. If you are using paraphrased citations, use footnotes to reference them. In case the author of the source is unknown, use the abbreviated title of the publication instead. When you are citing the same pages from the same source multiple times in your text, place the citation just once after the last reference. Since every quote should be cited according to the Chicago style, the citations can take up a big part of your paper. However, it is always better to provide as many citations as needed to create a quality paper. Every time you include a direct or paraphrased quote in your text, you should reference it using footnotes or endnotes. Footnotes are placed in the lower part of the page where the source material is referenced. Endnotes are included in the final parts of the chapter or document and contain references to all sources cited in the paper. The first time you are referencing the source, you need to include the full name of the author and the full title of the publication. If you are referencing the same source more than once in your paper, you should only include the last name of the author, the title shortened to fewer than 4 words, and page numbers. Bibliography The final page of every Chicago/Turabian paper is the bibliography page, which should contain a list of every source that was referenced in the paper. The page should be titled â€Å"Bibliography† and should include all works cited in the work, as well as other relevant sources. You need to list the sources alphabetically by the first letter of the author’s last name. Here is what each of your bibliography entries should include: The last and first name of the author. The name of the source. The titles of books and other long sources should be italicized, while the title of journal articles and similarly brief sources should be put in quotation marks. The information about the publisher. When citing online sources, remember to include the date when the article was retrieved, as well as the date when it was last modified, in case this information is available. The title of the journal. Each element of the bibliography entry should be separated by commas followed by a single space.